Editor's note: The video attached is related to a similar story posted earlier this week.
Reed’s family and legal team say new developments in the case exonerate him. Reed, 51, maintains his innocence.
“Early on I was somewhat upset, just for knowing her. If I wouldn’t have known her, I wouldn’t have been associated with her [and] I wouldn’t be in this situation,” Reed told ABC News’ Deborah Roberts in a jailhouse interview on Wednesday. “But, this is the situation that was handed to me so I have [to] accept … that I did know her. I have to accept that there was a relationship. I have to accept that I’m here now for something that I didn’t do.”
Reed, who is black, was convicted of Stites’ murder in 1998 and sentenced to death by an all-white jury. Bastrop County District Attorney Bryan Goertz said Reed has exhausted his option to appeal the case after appealing repeatedly from 2001 through 2015.
“None of them look like me but I … grew up in the military. I was a military brat. … I figured that they would hear the evidence and know that I’m innocent,” Reed told ABC News. “Race played a big part. I didn’t see it at first. … I wasn’t seeing racism like that.”
Reed has found support with local politicians and activists around the country, most famously including Kim Kardashian West. His supporters have called on Texas Governor Greg Abbott to stay his execution on Nov. 20.
“I hope that the right people look at this case in the right way,” Reed said. “The evidence will speak for itself.”
The Innocence Project, a non-profit legal organization that works to free wrongly convicted people, picked up Reed’s case in 2001. Bryce Benjet, senior attorney at the Innocence Project, is representing Reed.
Benjet’s team maintains that Reed and Stites were having a consensual sexual relationship while she was engaged to her fiancé. They argue that this explains why Reed’s DNA matched the semen found in Stites’ body.
“We had a relationship,” Reed said. “She wasn’t going to marry Jimmy … I don’t think she loved him.”
During the 1997 trial, the prosecution argued that this evidence showed that Reed raped Stites, and it ultimately led to his conviction.
The Innocence Project has filed a number of motions to test DNA evidence collected at the crime scene. His legal team argues that the belt found at the crime scene, which was used to strangle Stites, was never tested for DNA.
His defense team filed a federal lawsuit in August arguing that Reed’s civil rights have been violated because prosecutors and the state courts have repeatedly denied his DNA testing requests.
“The battle has been a long 23-year nightmare for us,” Sandra Reed, Rodney Reed’s mother, told ABC News. “But through it all, just knowing the truth has kept us strong -- has kept us in this fight for him. Just knowing he's innocent.”
Prosecutor Lisa Tanner told ABC News on Tuesday that she is still sure “the right man has been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of Stacey Stites’ murder.”
“I have spent more hours in my life in the last 22 years trying to figure out how Rodney Reed could've not killed Stacey Stites,” Tanner said. “Rodney Reed was a serial rapist. … The fact that his DNA was found on and in and around her body … the condition of her body, based on the condition of her clothing, based on the condition of the DNA [that] had obviously been deposited there that morning, when she was killed. That was the thing that was most irrefutable.”
In 2017, the Texas Court of Appeals rejected Reed’s request for court-ordered DNA testing, citing issues with possible cross contamination in storage. The following year, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Reed’s request to review the Texas court’s ruling.
Today, Reed says he tries “not to even entertain” the idea that he will die in three weeks.
“I feel that the truth is out there,” he said. “They’re going to be executing an innocent man.”
PEOPLE ARE ALSO READING: